Single Pass

Single Pass

Is this your company? Claim your profile to update info and connect with investors.
Claim profile

Private Company

Funding information not available

Overview

Single Pass is addressing a critical complication in millions of annual solid organ biopsies: post-procedure hemorrhage. Their solution, the Kronos device, is a disposable, guide needle-compatible electrocautery tool that promises to reduce bleeding events, lower associated costs from transfusions and extended hospital stays, and enable the use of larger needles for better samples. With FDA approval secured and strong physician testimonials highlighting its ease of use and effectiveness, the company is positioned for commercialization in the hospital-based interventional radiology market. Leadership with deep medical device commercialization experience is guiding this transition from an innovative product to standard of care.

Interventional RadiologyBiopsy Procedures

Technology Platform

Disposable, battery-powered electrocautery system designed to seal and cauterize biopsy needle tracts through a co-axial guide needle.

Opportunities

The primary opportunity is establishing the Kronos device as a new standard of care in millions of annual biopsy procedures, driven by strong clinical need and cost-saving potential.
Expansion into adjacent percutaneous procedures and development for different needle sizes or specific organs represent significant growth avenues.
Positive physician feedback suggests rapid adoption is possible if commercial execution is effective.

Risk Factors

Key risks include slow hospital adoption due to the added per-procedure cost and need to change clinical practice, alongside potential reimbursement challenges.
The company also faces future competition from larger medical device firms and must successfully scale its manufacturing and sales operations to meet demand.

Competitive Landscape

Single Pass's Kronos device is currently presented as a first-in-class, patented solution with no direct competitors mentioned. It competes indirectly against traditional methods of bleeding control (pressure, hemostatic agents). Success will likely attract competition from established interventional device companies (e.g., Boston Scientific, Medtronic) who could develop similar or alternative tract-sealing technologies.